Видео

Resectively in the United States multiple case result in " No Standing " can this be applied by ICJ / EU ?

progressives are a non existent group in the US - we have rainbow flags & DEI Not an old school left - I call it the NGO left

If the fear mongering isn’t working it’s because the people are wise. Not stupid. They have earnt their wisdom from collective consciousness and life…not from books, degrees and propaganda. It must be frustrating for those who lust for fear and panic in Europe. Wisdom is hard to indoctrinate. The media is stupid. Not the people.

When discussing how The question asked was why progressives were so easily sold on the Ukraine war? Not mentioned was what happened just before the Ukraine war. Covid happened. The propaganda and fear mongering surrounding Covid broke a lot of people’s critical thinking skills. A couple years of being told that you could die, the government will save you really affected people. We watched the bios of left leaning people online switch from having vaccine emojis to Ukrainian flag emojis over night.

The USA/Washington DC has always fought wars to create systemic disunity/division somewhere else on the planet, for own systemic gains, using a variety of means at its disposal (power). The only wars it has ever fought in history on the own continent (North America), was to create systemic unity/gain for itself. Elsewhere, wars were instigated, not avoided, "false flagged" into being, funded/supported, goaded, or declared, leading to disunity in the world, for the advantage of the dividers, in the USA. ------------------------------------- "The primordial interest of the United States - over which for a century we have fought wars (the first, second, and Cold War) - has been the relationship between Germany and Russia. Because united they are the only force that could threaten us. And to make sure that that doesn't happen. Therefore, it's not an accident that General Hodges, who's been appointed to be blamed for all of this, is talking about pre-positioning troops in Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, and the Baltics. This is the intermarium from the Black Sea to the Baltic that Pilsudski (edit: post-WW1 Polish dream of power in the wake of Russian and German weakness) dreamt of. This is this is the solution for the United States. ... For the United States: The primordial fear is German technology, German capital, and Russian natural resources, Russian manpower as the only combination that has for centuries scared the hell out of the United States. So how does this play out? Well, the US has already put its cards on the table. It is the line from the Baltics to the Black Sea." - George Friedman, Stratfor, Feb 2015 Yes, that has always been the aim of the naval powers, Great Britain and the USA. That includes this current war in the Ukraine" which was *not avoided* (grand strategy) by the USA/NATO even if it could have been avoided by very simple diplomatic means around the year 2000 (with a signed comprehensive European security agreement which incl. Russia). Several historians like Richard Overy (GB) and Daniele Ganser (Switzerland) have continuously and conclusively come to this conclusion, which is that imperialism were the root causes of all European wars, as based on the study of historical data. It is not a "conspiracy theory." That IS the premier priority of the powers not IN Eurasia, and still is. Here are the critical questions. If that is the realization, then HOW were the naval powers going to implement such continental Eurasian/European division? How were, both currently and historically, London and Washington DC going to (quote) "make sure that that doesn't happen"? Answer: Proactively implement the "divide and rule"-technique of power, or the associated divide then gain/control technique of power. It is to create confusion, which can be exploited.

Skrämmande information. Vem var det som inte tyckte att man skulle lyssna på dig.

Is this Jeffrey Sachs really too stupid to realise that Putin is a bestial criminal? The rubbish he spreads is disgusting.

Advocates defending their systemic greed, trying to hide behind "good deeds," are usually easily exposed: they utter fallacies like *"defending (superior) Western values",* whereas in reality all they are doing is defending the dividers, who operate and instigate from superior positions of power. They think reality disappears if they simply do not address it. Their own inbuilt bias means they are defending greed in the form of "50% of the world's wealth for us" (to quote US strategist Kennan), because what they don't realize is that they were *born into a belief system.* The main reason why that belief system persisted, was because of the GEOGRAPHICAL POSITION or POWER. Nothing else. This isn't an fallacy in reasoning, or a false premise, or syllogism. Overwhelmingly, people who are born into the belief system capitalism, will perceive it to be god's gift to mankind. Overwhelmingly, people who are born into the belief system corporatism, will perceive it to be god's gift to mankind. Overwhelmingly, people who are born into the belief system democracy, will perceive it to be god's gift to mankind. *All belief systems, mainly persists because advocates are born into the belief system (observation) or have been coddled into believing in it being superior as they grew up.* They are defending "greed" in the form of "50% for us" (or variations of that), for the minority, and that this minority of the world which is based in the USA or collective West, 12% of the world, has the right to rule over the rest of the world, by division. Greed can be proven to be the MOTIVATION of the top tiers, even if not necessarily by all who live in such systems, and it can be corroborated by observation.

22:46 Indeed! Self-reflection is a thing of the past, it seems.

It’s a very bad sign when Putin surfaces as choice between the least of two evils. Such huge shifts in Western ideology, greed and control. Our minds freely choose to ignore the bat hitting against our heads.

Liberalism is the ever evolving ideology of liberal Political Factions. And realism/conservativism is the ideology for conservative factions. Beyond the ideological perspectives of political factions is the overlooked NON-PARTISAN perspective. What's good for society vis-a-vis What's good for the party machine faction. The Founders of the USA knew this well. They established a Republic with a system of direct representation of citizens, without the "problem" of intermediary political party filters placed between citizen and government. The Founders understood that no matter what any faction stood for in ideology/policy, neither would be in the interest of society as a whole. For an incredible adventure on the denunciation of all types of political party organizations premie facia, read President George Washington's Farewell Address. Hamilton No. 09 "Violence of Faction," Madison No. 10 "Republican Form," and also, Robert Michel "Iron Law of Oligarchy (1911)." Upshot: THE NON PARTISAN PERSPECTIVE IS OVERLOOKED IN A WORLD OF CURRUPT OLIGARCH FACTIONS.

east germany has been ' disemboweled ' emptied from the inside ....... and the same strategy is used for the west....

The United States has also treated the icc with military intervention that’s how far they go to keep the court from looking into war crimes especially when the United States is involved they threatened to arrest the judges

The problem with Liberalism is that it has become the ideological host of Capitalism. It is a valid idea in itself, but unfortunately it carries a deadly parasite within its ideological body. Purged of Capitalism, liberalism could be force for good in the world. Capitalism, a parasitic ideology, needs a host, and any idea, religious, political or social, will do, as long as it's popular.

There all getting money from Israel that’s for shure and a lot of politicians are easy to buy and that needs to stop

A permanent agenda item? Thank you Pascal.

The evolution of political views that occurs in proximity to power, grants from government and private foundations etc. is simply opportunism. Opportunism plus rationalization leads to "genuine convictions" of sort. The question the opportunistic progressives do not want to face is this: what noble, progressive goals the decayed West can achieve when it intervenes, can it provide modicum of prosperity and positive social change? On economic issues, the West is not doing too well domestically, and while transition to services (including financial) and away from manufacturing and agriculture (in employment sense) plus "free market in utilities" etc. is not overly toxic domestically, it is disastrous in countries that should be developing, like Iraq and Afghanistan under American control. Perhaps a progressive proconsul in Iraq would do better than a neocon, but I did not see a sufficiently detailed constructive critique. On social issues, the intervening power must select local forces for mutual support. In Afghanistan, these were "mujahadeens" that were Islamist of a little bit more liberal variety than Taliban, but immensely more corrupt. So fewer burqas and more chadors etc., but nowhere as liberal as Iran and Pakistan. In Iraq, it was a total mess because local political forces were bitterly split between those who loathed Westerners and those who hated them (obviously, there were regional and sectarian issues). In Haiti, USA found the most corrupt possible supporters. Apart from local helpers, intervention relies on contractors, businesses and NGOs. Both easily get corrupted and/or ineffectual. Lastly, in USA, progressives may propose to alter details of an intervention, which may be heeded or not, but they are far from the actual power. Thus even if they do hard thinking about improving the interventions, e.g. less corruption, more productive investments, refraining from torture and similar abuses, they would probably achieve little.

Well American didn’t genocide Ukraine people through holodomor! Didn’t misplace by force western part of Ukraine to Siberia label them as people enemy to be used as free labour and confiscation of everything they have worked for for soviet farming kolhosp! I know who is genocide Slavic people of Kievian Rus and I know that kniaz of Kievian Rus Dolhorukiy but Moscow and old Slavic language is not Russian language!!! Gold orda sits for thousand years and bloodshed on land of people that were people that knew reason for human life because they knew creator God of humankind vs gods human created that brings hatred upon humankind!!! Stop spreading rubbish, read the history before running your fantasy based on your mind comprehension because sounds like your mind is in malfunction mode!!!

Perhaps make this a permanent agenda item: ask others to contribute to a discussion of this subject as it relates to liberalism, neoconservativism, neoliberalism, human rights. Ben Norton, Jeffrey Sachs, anyone you have interviewed and beyond. Thank you both.

Europe is a peninsula, not a continent.

Guest speak clearly plz😅 or new mic

These people don't want their values to govern, they just want their narcissistic self-gratification.

check out the BBC News article - The 1920s British air bombing campaign in Iraq this brought the issue of the Kurds on the global table. we must not forget that.

This conversation both raises some very important questions as well as it puts before us some obvious solutions which would bring about the change needed to correct our current system error!

Not a bad person, but 100% capitalism Stockholm syndrome. Obviously no knowledge of socialist history and ideas at all.

In the 19th century in Britain, this was known as Muscular Liberalism, it was championed by Gladstone and led to a sharp deterioration in Britains position in Europe, as the pontifical Gladstone attack every, as he saw it every autocratic government in Europe. The parallels with the west are inescapable. Lucky for Britain this disaster of a policy was reversed by the next Tory government. Unfortunately for the west as it stands now, reversing course will not be so easy, as literally the whole of the EU has followed the Americans off the cliff.

Due Dissidence, Democrats abandon "Progressive" label over Israel

The usa is the biggest terrorist in the world !! They need to accept the world is tired of usa hegemony

Considering the amount of United States' "defense" budget, it is physically impossible to conduct any more international military intervention. I am not sure if it is proper to call it a "defense" budget anymore

Where can I find the book mentioned, NEVER AGAIN WAR (without us)?

There's no way, logically, to defend the US and NATO in the smo with Ukraine and Russia. Mr Mott has some homework to do about the west's aggression against Russia

West Germany was full of nazis

If your governments are going to manage debt like this, that's the result. It is Liberal (in the classical sense), but in the USA, this kind of Liberalism has its home in the Republican party. This is the party of Liberalizing money in politics. It's also the party of dumping the entire tax and debt burden on workers, then locking them out of government. And it's the party of tax cuts for wealth, which is what caused the deficits in the first place. Enough said, it's corruption in any other age. If you don't have a graph of debt in the background of your social theories, you're doing it wrong.

Is there such a thing as a "progressive empire"? Imperialism requires, by definition, a suspension of democratic process, the censorship of dissent, both opinion and hard news, a huge military-industrial complex, a sophisticated propaganda apparatus etc... Imperialist progressivism is merely a rebranding of the US neo-conservatives' bloodlust for global hegemeony -- "Full Spectrum Dominance," in Pentagon-speak.

These people who perceive themselves as “progressive” need to be called out herein; they can actually become dangerous! They are actually very narrow and ignorant! Neoconservative with a twist! (From within institutions these sorts “teach the poor to budget” types; their level of gross ignorance is infinite! Herein they broaden their perception worldwide!) There are many people who think like so, it is they who need to be taught different, they are not progressive! Thanks for this discussion, they are not changing the world, they are trying to secure the status quo! Hence I summate, they are dangerous!😂

Crimea is Ukrainian territory. It's not a Russian business.

Thank you

Why are calling these people intelligent? These people are utterly dumb. Having a PHD is no guarantee that you're intelligent .

This is what happens when you are brainwashed by SVT and have maniac Socialdemocrats that will DO ANYTHING TO CLAIM TO POWER! Grisjävlar

AFTER EVERYTHING IS SAID AND DONE ABOUT US BEING SELFISH, AND EUROPE BEING VASSAL STATES, AND THAT BOTH ARE RULED BY NEOCONS WHO ARE BRIGHTLY POLISHED VERSIONS OF RACISTS.. FACT REMAINS THAT THESE COUNTRIES WERE ALLOWING IMMIGRATION FROM REST OF THE WORLD, AND MORE OR LESS LIVE IN HARMONY... RUSSIANS ARE ALSO RACIST, YOU CAN JUST SEE THIS HOW RUSSIANS BEHAVE IN COUNTRIES THEY VISIT.. CHINESE, TAIWANESE, JAPANESE - ALL ARE RACIST..ONE CAN SEE THIS HOW PEOPLE OF OTHER COUNTRIES ARE TREATED... IF NATO IS OVERLY SENSITIVE, THAT IS BECAUSE OF THE GUILT THEY CARRY FROM THEIR COLONIAL PAST AND DREAD VENGEANCE BY THOSE COLONIZED COUNTRIES... AT SOME POINT, ALL THESE PRIVILEGED COUNTRIES MAY NEED TO LIVE BY THE SWORD, LIKE RIGHT NOW ISRAEL DOES...AND THIS PROBLEM SOLVES ITSELF WHEN THEIR CITIZENS LEARN HOW TO ELECT A GOVT WHICH IS NOT RULED BY LOBBIES AND SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS.. MEANING WHEN THEY BECOME THE DEMOCRACIES THEY USED TO BE

I also think there’s 2 parts to the heart of the American establishment. Liberal left and Rightwing turning more towards fascism. I’m glad they found 2 progressive professing researchers who want to tell us it’s good to become far right. Disgusting.

What about the transparencies on covid vax contracts?!!

Afghanistan, 20 years of war, 20 years of continually record breaking opium production.

“Progressive” - like “woke” - is identity branding. People who wanted to distinguish themselves from establishment ‘liberal’ Democrats in the late ‘90’s and early 2000’s referred to themselves as ‘progressives.’ Just like ‘woke’ (which has anything to do with anybody but minorities) the term was, of course, adopted by the mainstream of Democratic and left-leaning (including Bernie type of socialist democrat) voter. So, using here as ‘progressives should get comfortable with [imperial colonialist hyper-aggression]’ - is a marketing technique aimed at their followers. This is how they roll.

I suggest, one of the nuclear power-states has to leave the UNSC for a whole year, if this state provoked the most massive casualties under civilian people in comparison in the past year. Simple as that.

NO NEED TO CLASSIFY THESE FELLOWS AS PROGRESSIVES OR CONSERVATIVES OR SOMETHING ELSE AS LONG AS THEY ARE AND CAN EASILY BE CONTROLLED BY THE LOBBIES

I was contemplating the lady's proposals recently and it seems s quick regime change is not a preferred option But a protracted war which is a diversion ?, from what and for whom?

To be progressive used to mean striving for a just and good and peaceful world. But now it means to be confrontational, judgemental and devoid of all common sense.

As a brazillian, it was a coup. It followed the 2016 and 2018 successfull coup and electoral manipulation.

Palestinians are jews as well. Golda Meir had palestinian pasport. UN and UNRWA are all corrupts. There is no palestinian nation...they are egyptian refugees..jordaias refugees..soud arabian refugees...Exactly clearly stated,they areREFUGEES from those countries to Gaza. You should listen this as well: THIS ARE SOME VOICES OF REASON ruclips.net/video/wkvaxLaIsG0/видео.html ruclips.net/video/EGmg198RpEk/видео.html ruclips.net/video/QWC9wCWwGX8/видео.html